L-ittra mill-Kummissjoni Amministrazzjoni tal-Gustizzja datata 4-Oct-04
Letter from the Commission for the Administration of Justice dated 4-Oct-04
The Commission for the Administration of Justice commissioned me to inform you that the Sub-Commission, after having examined all acts and dispositions, is of the idea that the complaint of Nicholas Grech can be considered founded solely in regard to some words that Magistrate Carol Peralta could have addressed in relation to the mentioned Grech from the tribune in a way that the same Grech felt he was not being treated as it should, words which could have not been said because they were not fruitful to the proceedings of the case.
Jekk dan il-kliem "ma kienx utili ghall-andament tal-kawza" ghaliex qalhom Peralta "minn fuq it-Tribuna". Kien xurban, kien provokat jew forsi haseb li kien f'xi kazin biex kellu jaqa' ghal dan il-livell hekk baxx f'awla tal-Qorti? Xejn minn dan, ried biss jintimidani u jaghmel cover-up tal-abbuzi ta' xhieda falza u tbaghbis ta' provi ntenzjonati li jtelfuli l-liberta provizorja li saru fis-seduta tal-5/07/01. Sussegwemtament "id-deluzjonijiet ta' persekuzzjoni" li l-Psikjatra David Cassar wahdu attribwixxa li kont insofri minnhom fis-seduta tat-12/06/02 biex jaqfilni l-isptar ma kienet xejn ghajr gidba sfaccata kif ikkonfermata b'din l-ittra ta' xi haga verament tinten u djabolika li kienet ghaddejja fil-kaz tieghi. Imma kif ma temminx espert tal-Qorti, David Cassar, specjalment meta l-kaz kien qed jinstema quddiem magistrat li kien komplici kellu hafna x'jitlef jekk ma jiskreditawnix u jittimbrawni ta' mentali qabel ikun tard wisq halli ma nkun qatt f'pozizzjoni li nikxef dawn l-abbuzi u nitwemmen. U ghaliex l-avukati tieghi ma ntervjenewx u ma semmew xejn, ghaliex dan il-favoritizmu kollu? Mhux biss hu skomdu ghal kwalunkwe avukat li jiksirha ma magistrat is-superjur tieghu ghall-gieh il-klient tieghu l-akkuzat, imma nzerta wkoll li ta' kontrija ma kien hadd hlief ex-registratur tal-Qorti, u hemm il-Qorti kienet l-ghalqa tieghu, kien jaf lil kullhadd, kull fejn ikun, kulhadd isellimlu.
If they "were not fruitful to the proceedings of the case" why did Peralta utter them "from the tribune"? Was he drunk, was he provoked or maybe thought he was in some local band club to go to such absurdly low levels in a court room? None of this, he just wanted to intimidate me and cover up the abuses of false witness and tampering of evidence intentioned to make me loose the bail that took place in the Court sitting of 5-Jul-01. The subsequent "delusions of persecution" Psychiatric David Cassar alone attributed that I was suffering from in the court sitting of 12-Jun-02 to lock me up in hospital was nothing but a blatant lie as confirmed by this letter of instead something really malicious and diabolic that was taking place in my court case. But how not to believe a supposed expert of the Court, David Cassar, especially when the case was being heard in front of a magistrate who was an accomplice had so much to loose if they didn't discredit and label me as a mental before it was to late so that I would never be in a position of uncovering such abuses and be believed. And why my lawyers didn't intervene and mentioned nothing, why all this favouritisms? Not only is it uncomfortable for any lawyer to break it up with a magistrate his superior for the sake of his client the accused, but my opponent happened to be no other than an ex-registrar of the Court, and there the Court was his playing field, he knew everyone, wherever he was, everyone sending him their regards.