English translation: (the parts in brackets are my additions)
(pg.27) Now, neither to say hello, nor to apologize ourselves and this after a warning that was given by the Police to not in any way communicate with her. We explained to him, neither with her nor with any other. I understand that to Mr. Romeo Camilleri and all his family, a letter of this sort annoys them, namely because it was not the first time, was not the first letter. We made the recourse neither because it is an apology, nor because it is something else, simply because of the fact he communicated with them. He was ordered to in no way communicate with them. We did not make the recourse because of the videos in question (the mentioned R. Camilleri had just beforehand falsely testified mentioning the video), those came after the letter, after we made the recourse came the videos. We are still investigating in this regard. When we made the recourse we had in hand the letter. When we got the videos in hand, we began investigating them.
Court: To which timeframe do the videos refer to? (Note Magistrate Carol Peralta is asking on the videos because of the commotion created in the Court when R. Camilleri had beforehand testified about them).
Witness: Mr. Romeo Camilleri had talked with us (Note the plural) regarding the videos, we asked him to bring them, he subsequently brought them, we had already submitted it (the recourse) because had came the letter and submitted the recourse immediately. We did not make the recourse concerning the videos. I felt I had to do the recourse because of this communication made, and when we talked with him myself and the Assistant Commissioner Rizzo (the two for whom the plural was used), he admitted he had sent this letter.

Analysis

The handwritten parts are my notes after having probably submitted this document to the Commission for the Administration of Justice and are 1) Police Inspector Carmelo Bartolo (the witness) avoids the question, 2) The complicity of John Rizzo in the frame-up of the video and the scratch on the car.

Note how first they came with this supposedly overwhelming evidence of the video to make me loose the bail, and then it resulted in being no evidence at all because it was never mentioned again - it was a blatant frame-up and perjury false testimony. R. Camilleri was an ex-registrar of the Courts and Magistrate Carol Peralta used to refer to him as "my friend". As regards the mentioned apology letter I had sent them, it was sort to make them fall for my bait, in part to excuse myself for my wrongdoings and at the same time exploit their intense appetite for revenge for them to end commit crimes on me that help me uncover their true mask, possibly turning the case in my favour, make mine look negligible compared to theirs, as in fact happened.

From the way that R. Camilleri had testified when asked to describe the contents of the video, I realized that it was in fact me who was recorded in the video, only that this had happened before my arrest, yet they, with all the blessing of the Police, tried to frame me up made it appear to have taken place afterwards to end loose me the bail. The subsequent abuse by Magistrate Carol Peralta in the 4th Court sitting of 4-Feb-02 threatening me of smashing me against the wall was a direct consequence of this frame-up on me with this video in his attempt to cover-up this and other abuses I had just told him about. This wasn't the only frame-up the Police had done on me, another one was the Police statement, despite not containing my true signature to the point that I ended having one of the accusations, i, that of falsifying signatures ("he did falsifications with fake signatures") they submitted it to the Court in my name anyway.

Timeline of events

• Wed 13-Jun-01 - was arrested after returning home from work by bus at around 16:00.
• Fri 15-Jun-01 - my 1st Court experience, appeared in front of Magistrate Carol Peralta who released me out on bail under extreme conditions (had to sign twice daily, all night stay locked at home, not approach 5 towns, 4 of them had nothing to do with the case, namely Sliema, St. Julians, and Rabat which included Mdina within, simply for being places containing night life and entertainment venues, which the daughter of that ex-registrar of the Court used to frequent while at the same time portraying her as the pure virgin and me as obsessed of her). Inspector Carmelo Bartolo submits in my name a Police statement not containing my true signature and at the same time accuses me of falsifying signatures.
• Thur 21-Jun-01 - tried my luck wrote an apology letter and sent it same day, reaching destination the day after. Note that I simply wrote my name at the end, didn't put my signature for I didn't trust them and was expecting some form of revenge.
• Fri 22-Jun-01 - that ex-registrar of the Court R. Camilleri receives the letter and informs Police immediately same day. Probably the Police tell him that simply an apology letter won't be enough to lose me the bail, so they had to additionally frame me up with some really nasty things.
• Night between Sat 23 - Sun 24-Jun-01 - they invented to have seen me during this night in Bahar ic-Caghak near their home. The problem was that during my arrest, the Police had confiscated my motorcycle, so ended without a means of transport, in particular during the night when there is no bus service. And ask yourself what purpose it was for me to go there for nothing simply to give them the excuse to lose myself the bail? Had it been really the case, I would presume they to have also informed the Police immediately the same night or at most early Sunday morning, as they had done with the apology letter.
• Mon 25-Jun-01 - so much was intense their appetite of revenge on me, that they also invented that on this day went to scratch a car of one I never knew from Adam. Also on this day a recource by the Police was submitted to the Court to lose me the bail for having sent the apology letter (mentions the ex-registrar of the Court R. Camilleri to have informed them of this on 22-Jun-01), but there is absolutely no mention at all of me to have been seen at Bahar ic-Caghak despite this supposed to have happened 2 nights before and the Police had thus ample time to investigate it.
• Thur 28-Jun-01 - lawyer Joe Giglio on behalf of that ex-registrar of the Court R. Camilleri and his family, submits a recourse to the Court to lose me the bail, on grounds of having sent them the apology letter and mentioning framing me up with things I didn't do to have scratched a car and to have been seen at night at Bahar ic-Caghak.
• During same week - I think it was some time during this week when was asked to go to the Police Depot where found waiting for me Assistant Commissioner John Rizzo and Inspector Carmelo Bartolo who interrogated me regarding the apology letter which I admitted to have sent, on the scratch on the car which I denied any involvement, and saying they had a video showing me on a motorcycle at Bahar ic-Caghak which I likewise denied.
• Thur 5-Jul-01 - was again arraigned to Court specifically in their attempt to lose me the bail. After all the fuss, no mention at all to have scratched a car neither by the Police nor by that R. Camilleri. R. Camilleri testifies what was supposed to be seen in a video showing me on a motor cycle near his home, when this has happened before the arrest and they tried to frame me up portraying it to have taken place afterwards as explained further above (rest assured had I dared have done any acts of vandalism as they had accused me of, they would have selected a video recording me doing so to further aggravate the matter). Inspector Carmelo Bartolo says they are still investigating the video after presumably to have already been in their hands now for 11 days, and in the next court sittings was never mentioned again, nor what had resulted from its supposed investigation.
• Mon 4-Feb-02 - my 4th court sitting. When was called by Magistrate Carol Peralta to go near him to talk to me face to face, just managed to tell him that false testimony had taken place in a previous court sitting, only to end threatened by him with the words "don't respond me because I will smash you against the wall." When back home, recounted what happened to my father who told me "duk fursi bix ma jurix li se jejnik / Maybe to not let them know he is going to help you." It happened that my uncle-in-law was friends with Peralta (had their boats / yachts moored near each other in Msida or something of this sort) and sometime between the 2nd court sitting and this sitting he went to find Peralta in Courts to talk about my case in the hope he could be of help in some way. Peralta offered him next time to come together with my parents as in fact happened and told them something of this sort "Nara x'nista' naghmel, imma ghamel hafna / Will see what I can do, but he did a lot." So I ended taking the advise of my father and kept back from reporting the incident of this court sitting. But when 2 weeks later was seen by Psychiatrist David Cassar, indirectly told me what were Magistrate Carol Peralta's intentions (Peralta's "what I can do"): save me the career by not sentencing me to prison, but had to pay for the defamation and so on, but I told him that if they were to continue prosecuting against me, they should prosecute against Magistrate Carol Peralta in the 1st place.
  
  
  
• Tue 12-Jun-02 - made a Court sitting to kidnap me lock me at Mount Carmel Hospital with the blatant lies by the big fraudster of Psychiatrist David Cassar that I was suffering from delusions of persecution, indirectly to discredit me give me the label of a mental make it further difficult for me to uncover the abuses and be that easily believed, to save Magistrate Carol Peralta the career. My lawyer had intentionally abondoned me a few days before to facilitate me ending kidnapped. Magistrate Carol Peralta nominates instead lawyer Tonio Azzopardi (instead of another one who's turn it was) who the day before I was to be seen by the 3 Psychiatrists sent me this letter threatening me with extortion (rikatt). After no less than 37 days locked, kidnapped (these 37 consecutive days were the only days I ever took as sick leave in the 15 and a half years that I worked), I reported the matter to the Commission for the Administration of Justice.
  

Now ask yourself if such a big fraudster and liar of Psychiatrist David Cassar who covers-up abuses of mere staff / nurses whom I had reported for passing entire nights when on work sleeping, of stealing patients' food and even ended smashing my laptop, would you think he would have thought it twice to cover-up the abuses of such big head as Magistrate Carol Peralta and the rest of the friends of friends?

Abuses of Police Inspector, now Supretendent, Carmelo Bartolo in my 1st Court case of 2001

then Police Inspector Carmelo Bartolo.

1. He framed me up in my first Court case when he presented to the Court a Police statement in my name when he knew it did not contain my true signature to the point that he accused me with falsification of signatures.
2. He was an accomplice in the frame-up of the video mentioned on 5-Jul-01 (see above) to make me loose the Provisional Liberty and even testified falsely in Court that the video was still being investigated.
3. He tampered with evidence, a video that took place before the arrest made it appear it happened after the arrest to make me loose the bail.
4. He made these crimes when he was duty bound to prevent.